The farm goods at the heart of the US-China trade war By Juliette MICHEL New York (AFP) Dec 12, 2019 In trade negotiations with China, President Donald Trump has made it a priority that the Asian giant buy tens of billions of dollars in US farm goods. Achieving that goal is another matter. - How much do the US and China trade? - From 2008, China was either the largest or second-largest importer of American agricultural products. That all changed when the Trump administration launched the wide-ranging trade war. In response to Washington-imposed sanctions, Beijing chose measures targeted particularly at US farmers, such as increasing taxes on soy imports to 33 percent and on pork imports to 72 percent. The effect was immediate: US agricultural exports, which had peaked at $26 billion in 2012-2013 after a drought caused grain and oilseed prices to skyrocket, plummeted to $9.2 billion in 2018, from $19.5 billion in 2017. But since September, China has made several goodwill gestures, most notably by increasing its orders for US products. According to the US Department of Agriculture, Chinese buyers committed in early December to buying nearly 9.8 million tons of soy from this year's summer harvest, versus the slightly less than 500,000 tons they bought from the same period in 2018. The new amount is still far less than the 21.5 million tons purchased in 2017. Beijing also announced on December 6 it had begun exempting certain imports of US pork and soy from customs taxes. In October, China also lifted an embargo on US poultry that had been in effect since 2015. - What does Trump want? - Although few details have emerged on trade negotiations, Trump said in October that China had agreed to buy $40 to $50 billion dollars worth of US agricultural products. "It is pretty obvious that, ahead of the next election, President Trump wants to maintain his base in the agricultural community," said Bill Nelson, a chief economist at Doane Advisory Services. To soften the losses suffered by US farmers affected by new customs taxes, the Trump administration agreed to provide a total of $28 billion over the course of 2018 and 2019. But farmers have regularly stressed they would prefer to earn money by selling their products. - Is this goal realistic? - China could relatively easily import another $20 to $25 billion of US agricultural products again, if only by turning to the US for soybeans as opposed to Brazil or Argentina, according to Nelson. But he thinks it is "unlikely" that China could suddenly buy as much as $50 billion worth of goods each year. When US exports peaked at $26 billion, agricultural commodity prices were significantly higher. For instance, soy cost $13 to $17 per bushel, compared to its current price of about nine dollars per bushel. In addition to soy and sorghum, China would also need to buy significantly more corn, wheat and cotton, and to consider products like ethanol as agricultural goods. But even doing so would not necessarily produce a miracle. Beijing -- whose pig population has been hit hard by an epidemic -- increased the volume of US pork it imported by 55 percent between January and October of this year, but that added up to only $975 million, according to the US Meat Export Federation.
Large atmospheric waves in the jet stream present risk to global food production Oxford UK (SPX) Dec 10, 2019 In a new study published in Nature Climate Change, scientists show how specific wave patterns in the jet stream strongly increase the chance of co-occurring heatwaves in major food producing regions of Northern America, Western Europe and Asia. Their research finds that these simultaneous heatwaves significantly reduce crop production across those regions, creating the risk of multiple harvest failures and other far-reaching societal consequences, including social unrest. Lead author, Dr Kai ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |