 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Organic food not healthier, says British study
London (AFP) July 31, 2009 Organic food supporters defended the benefits of naturally-grown produce on Friday, after a report suggested there are no significant health advantages from it. In a study published in a US journal this week, researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) found there were no major differences between organic and conventionally-produced food. "A small number of differences in nutrient content were found to exist between organically and conventionally-produced crops and livestock, said Dr. Alan Dangour, principal author of the study. "But these are unlikely to be of any public health relevance." And he added: "Our review indicates that there is currently no evidence to support the selection of organically over conventionally-produced foods on the basis of nutritional superiority." Organic food, devoid of additives and produced without chemicals such as fertilisers and pesticides, has become an increasingly popular choice on supermarket shelves in recent years. But it is typically more expensive than regular foostuffs, and as such has already been hit by the global recession, making shoppers think twice about paying more for organically-grown vegetables and such like. The study, commissioned by Britain's Food Standards Agency (FSA) and published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, threatens to deal a new blow to the organic food lobby. But its supporters underlined other benefits of organic produce, notably for the environment. "Organic farming is a holistic, integrated approach which conserves soils, encourages biodiversity, eliminates greenhouse gas-intensive nitrogen inputs, conserves genetic diversity, and brings more income to the grower," said Andrew Lee of the Sustainable Development Commission. "And is very probably healthier to boot," he wrote in a letter to the Guardian newspaper. Molly Connisbee of the Soil Association said that organic farms have on average 30 percent more species and 50 percent more wildlife like birds, butterflies and bees. "Other environmental benefits are self-evident -- there's less dangerous waste on organic farms and almost no pesticide use. Artificial nitrogen fertiliser is banned in organic farming, so there's less runoff of nutrients that cause algae blooms in coastal waters," she said. The British study was based on a review of all studies published over the last 50 years relating to nutritional content and health differences between the two kinds of produce. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Farming Today - Suppliers and Technology
Many Marine Ecosystems Can Recover Under Appropriate ManagementWoods Hole MA (SPX) Aug 03, 2009 An international team of scientists with divergent views on ocean ecosystems has found that efforts to rebuild many of the world's fisheries are worthwhile and starting to pay off in many places around the world. Their study puts into perspective recent reports predicting a total collapse of global fisheries within 40 years. In a paper published in the July 31 issue of Science, study ... read more |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Google
Facebook